The fact is that the underlying principle of socialism is force. If you ask the average American what the underlying principle of socialism is, he/she will either try to look it up in an online dictionary or mouth something that's similar to "government owned", never addressing the question. It's gone so far into socialism that the average American will claim that he/she doesn't want socialism, while at the same time they rely on a government program which really represents theft of someone to redistribute to someone else.
#1984 john hurt full movie english free
One of the reasons for America moving away from being a free country to a heavily socialistic country is the growing ignorance of it's inhabitants.
#1984 john hurt full movie english movie
Read full reviewġ984 2003 Edition, 1st Edition with Edmund OBrienĮxcellent movie and story despite the similarities in todays society. I think that he brought a great quality of desperation to the role which seemed to run contrary to John Hurt's performance.Īdditionally, some of you may (or may not) be happy to know that there are plans for a 2009 remake of 1984, but not much is known about it other than a short blurb on imbd. Edmund O'Brien turned in a great performance as Winston Smith.
This version was well-cast, and the art direction was also competent. It is also noteworthy that the lesser known 1956 version of Nineteen Eighty-Four (Directed by Michael Anderson and staring Edmond O'Brien) is also available. One can't give such a statement about films these days.Īmazing casting, terrific musical score, and mind-blowing sets, cinematography, and direction, "1984" is surely a unique treasure, and one that still retains the same timeless messages even decades since its release.
In other words, this film was FAITHFUL, in every sense of the word, to its source material. Easily, its most im pressive aspect was its phenomenal accuracy, attention to detail, etc. "1984" is probably one of the most, if not THE most, masterful transitions from book to movie I have ever seen. A picture based on such complex, prophetic, and well-known material could have turned out to be a complete disaster (which it certainly had potential for, judging from the horrendous-looking DVD cover) thankfully, however, I was not disappointed. This, to me, is a prime example of perfect, and unbelievably well-timed, brilliance.
Merely a few days after finishing my read of George Orwell's fantastic 1948 novel "Nineteen Eighty-Four", I was immediately keen on looking to rent the modern film version, "1984" - filmed, appropriately enough, not only during the actual YEAR of 1984, but also during the exact same short span of months that the story took place in. Nonetheless, for true fans of the book, the movie provides a very satisfying visualization of Orwell's story. Viewers who have not read (and appreciated) the book will find it pretty rough going. Viewers who read the book years ago will come away feeling that the movie must have left something out altogether. Viewers who have read the book recently will have no problem following the movie, but will likely come away feeling that someho w the movie "missed" something.
There is insufficient plot and character development for the viewer to really establish a connection with Winston and his mindset, or to truly appreciate the depth of oppression party members experience in Oceania - right down to continually re-writing history and eviscerating the language in efforts to make "thoughtcrime" impossible. The problem is that the movie is just too short and moves too fast. The oppressive, dreary, monotone darkness of Oceania is palpable, as are Winston's emotional swings from dull resignation to vague unfocused rumblings of revolt, to abject terror. This is a very faithful adaptation of the book as far as it goes. Orwell's 1984 with John Hurt and Richard Burton
0 kommentar(er)
